← User Guide

Outreach Templates

Pre-built cold email sequences and LinkedIn posts. Copy, customise, and send.

Industry Insight

Data-driven observations that position you as a market expert.

AU CRM cost breakdown

Australian recruitment agencies spend between A$99 and A$315 per seat per month on CRM software. Most of those platforms were built in the US or UK. Which means you're paying US prices for software that doesn't integrate with SEEK, doesn't understand Australian ABN structures, and charges extra for basic features like email sequencing and phone verification. Here's what a typical AU agency tech stack actually costs: - CRM: A$99-315/seat - Email sequencing tool: A$50-150/mo - Phone/dialler: A$30-80/seat - Data enrichment: A$100-300/mo - Email verification: A$30-50/mo That's A$400-800/month before you've placed a single candidate. The question isn't whether you can afford a better tool. It's whether you can afford not to consolidate. [SHARE YOUR OWN EXPERIENCE: what does your agency spend on tools per month?]
Customisation tips:
  • Replace the cost figures with your own research or experience if you have more specific data.
  • Tag 2-3 agency owners you know to spark discussion in the comments.
  • Post on Tuesday or Wednesday morning for maximum reach.

AU recruitment market fragmentation

There are roughly 8,500 recruitment agencies in Australia. The vast majority have fewer than 10 consultants. Yet the CRM market treats them the same as 500-seat enterprises. A$50K implementation. 12-month contracts. Features designed for Fortune 500 hiring volumes. Here's what small AU agencies actually need: 1. SEEK and Indeed integration (not US job boards) 2. Australian phone number enrichment (not US-only databases) 3. Pricing in AUD that doesn't assume 50 seats 4. Email, calling, and CRM in one login The gap between what enterprise CRMs sell and what [NUMBER]-person agencies need is enormous. And that gap is an opportunity. [YOUR TAKE: what's the biggest tool frustration in your agency right now?]
Customisation tips:
  • Replace [NUMBER] with your own team size to make it personal.
  • End with a genuine question to drive comments.
  • The 8,500 figure comes from IBIS World — cite your source if challenged.

AI adoption in AU hiring

By 2026, an estimated 80% of Australian enterprises will use AI somewhere in their hiring process. But here's what that actually looks like in practice: - Resume screening (the easy part) - Interview scheduling (table stakes) - Candidate sourcing (where the real leverage is) Most agencies are still manually searching LinkedIn, copying names into spreadsheets, and sending one-by-one emails. The agencies that will win the next three years aren't the ones with the biggest teams. They're the ones that use AI to: 1. Research companies at scale 2. Find decision-maker contact details automatically 3. Generate personalised outreach that actually gets replies 4. Transcribe and summarise every sales call The question isn't IF your competitors will adopt AI. It's whether you'll be ahead of them or behind them when they do. [SHARE: what's one task in your agency that should be automated but isn't?]
Customisation tips:
  • Cite a specific source for the 80% stat (Deloitte, AHRI, or similar).
  • Share your own AI adoption story in the comments after posting.
  • Avoid mentioning specific tools in the post — let people ask in comments.

Framework / How-To

Step-by-step processes your audience can apply immediately.

SEEK-to-placement pipeline

5-step process to build a candidate pipeline from SEEK to placement: Step 1: Set up a search config Define your target roles, locations, and industries. Run this against SEEK and Indeed daily — not manually, automatically. Step 2: Identify hiring companies Every job posting tells you which companies are spending money on recruitment. These are your warmest prospects. Sort by posting volume. Step 3: Find the decision-makers For each company, find the hiring manager or HR director. Name, email, phone. Not the careers@ inbox — the actual person. Step 4: Personalised outreach Reference the specific role they're hiring for. Show you've done your homework. One paragraph, one question. Step 5: Follow up with a call 48 hours after sending, pick up the phone. "Hi [NAME], I sent you a note about your [ROLE] hire — did it land?" That's it. Five steps. Repeat daily. The agencies that do this consistently bill more than the ones that wait for inbound. [SAVE this for later — or tell me which step you struggle with most]
Customisation tips:
  • This works as a carousel too — one step per slide with a visual for each.
  • Add your own success metrics to Step 5 (e.g., 'this generates 15% reply rates for us').
  • Post with a hook image showing a simple pipeline diagram.

Finding decision-makers with public data

How to find decision-makers at any Australian company in 5 minutes: Step 1: Start with the ABN Search the company on ABR (abr.business.gov.au). You'll get the entity name, ABN, registration date, and state. Step 2: Check ASIC for directors If it's a Pty Ltd, ASIC records show current directors. These are the people who actually make decisions. Step 3: Cross-reference on LinkedIn Take the director names and search LinkedIn. Now you have their current title and company page. Step 4: Find their email Most Australian businesses use first.last@company.com.au or first@company.com.au. Verify before sending. Step 5: Make contact Reference something specific — their company's growth, a recent hire, an industry trend. Not a generic pitch. This works for any Australian Pty Ltd, and the data is publicly available. You don't need expensive databases. [BOOKMARK this — you'll use it more than you think]
Customisation tips:
  • Mention that ASIC company extracts cost A$9 each — some people don't know they're accessible.
  • Add a screenshot of an ABR search result to make it visual.
  • Caveat: this works best for Pty Ltd companies, not sole traders.

Cold email formula for 15% reply rates

The cold email formula that gets us 15% reply rates: SUBJECT: {First name}, quick question about [SPECIFIC THING] LINE 1: Observation "I noticed [COMPANY] is hiring for [ROLE] in [LOCATION]." Show you've done your homework. No generic openers. LINE 2: Problem "Roles like that tend to sit open for 40+ days when sourced through job boards alone." Name the pain they're probably feeling. LINE 3: Bridge "We placed a similar role in 12 days last month." One sentence of proof. No essays. LINE 4: CTA "Worth a 10-minute call this week?" Low-commitment ask. Easy to say yes to. Rules: - Under 80 words total - No attachments - No links in the first email - Plain text (no HTML formatting) - Send Tuesday-Thursday, 8-10am recipient's time zone The agencies getting replies aren't writing better emails. They're writing shorter ones. [DROP a fire emoji if you want the follow-up sequence template]
Customisation tips:
  • Replace the example with your own real numbers if you have them.
  • If you get engagement, post the follow-up sequence as a Part 2 the next week.
  • Tag a colleague who writes long emails — friendly banter drives reach.

Behind the Scenes

Product decisions and founder stories that build trust.

Why we built a dialler into the CRM

We built a phone dialler directly into our CRM. Here's why. Every recruiter I spoke to during our research phase said the same thing: "I switch between my CRM, my dialler, my notes app, and my calendar 50 times a day." That's not a workflow. That's context-switching tax. So we built calling into the same screen where you see the contact's history, company details, and campaign status. Click the phone icon. The call starts in your browser. AI transcribes in real time. When you hang up — summary, action items, and next steps appear automatically. No separate app. No copy-pasting notes. No "let me check my CRM and call you back." The best tool isn't the one with the most features. It's the one that eliminates the gaps between features. [If you're a recruiter — what's the most annoying context switch in your day?]
Customisation tips:
  • Include a screenshot or short screen recording of the dialler in action.
  • Focus on the problem (context-switching), not the feature (dialler).
  • This works well as a story post — personal, specific, relatable.

Behind the scenes: enrichment at scale

Last month we processed [X,XXX] enrichment requests across our platform. Here's what that means in plain English: Every time a user clicks "Find Contacts" on a company, we search multiple data sources simultaneously to find the right person's name, verified email, and phone number. Not a generic careers@ inbox. The actual decision-maker. What surprised us: - [XX]% of emails needed verification against multiple providers - Australian phone numbers are harder to source than US or UK - Company lines (02, 03, 07, 08) are often more valuable than direct dials - Caching saves our users thousands of credits per month Building data infrastructure for the Australian market is genuinely harder than the US. Smaller databases. Fewer providers. More validation needed. But that's exactly why we built here first. If it works for AU, it works anywhere. [FOLLOW along — more behind-the-scenes posts coming each week]
Customisation tips:
  • Replace [X,XXX] and [XX]% with real numbers when you have them — specificity builds trust.
  • Don't mention provider names (Lusha, PDL, etc.) — keep it generic.
  • This type of post works best when paired with a simple stat graphic.

Why we built for Australia first

Everyone told us to build for the US market first. We didn't. Here's why. Australia has 8,500 recruitment agencies, most with 1-10 consultants. They're underserved, overcharged, and stuck using tools that were designed for American hiring practices. SEEK is the dominant job board. Not Indeed. Not LinkedIn Jobs. ABN and ASIC are how you verify companies. Not D&B or ZoomInfo. AU phone numbers have specific formatting rules. +61, not +1. None of the US-built CRMs handle this natively. So we built a platform that: - Scrapes SEEK and Indeed daily - Enriches with AU-specific data sources - Prices in AUD (no currency conversion surprises) - Integrates with AU trades directories and government registers The thesis is simple: win Australia first, then expand. Not the other way around. Every feature is AU-native. Global is a nice-to-have, not the starting point. [Agree? Disagree? I'd love to hear from other AU founders building locally first]
Customisation tips:
  • This is a strong founder-story post — share your personal motivation too.
  • Expect some pushback from 'go global first' advocates — engage with it.
  • Post on Wednesday morning AEST for maximum AU audience reach.

Customer Win

Real results that demonstrate value without being salesy.

3 placements in the first week

Last week an Australian recruitment agency signed up for our platform. By Friday, they'd placed three candidates. Here's what they did differently: Day 1: Set up their search config for [INDUSTRY] roles in [CITY]. Ran an automated SEEK scrape. 200+ companies appeared in their pipeline. Day 2: Used "Find Contacts" on their top 20 companies. Found 45 decision-makers with verified emails. Day 3: Launched an AI-generated email campaign. Personalised to each contact's company and role. Day 4: Got 7 replies. Called all of them straight from the platform. Day 5: Three meetings booked. Two turned into placements that week. Third closed the following Monday. They didn't have a bigger team. They didn't have better candidates. They just had a faster workflow. Speed wins in recruitment. Always has, always will. [If you're in recruitment — what does your Day 1 to placement timeline look like?]
Customisation tips:
  • Replace [INDUSTRY] and [CITY] with real details when you can (with permission).
  • Don't name the agency unless they've agreed to be featured.
  • Follow up in comments with the specific numbers (emails sent, reply rate, etc.).

Switching from legacy CRM — A$200/seat saved

An AU agency came to us last month paying A$250/seat/month for their CRM. Four seats. A$1,000/month. A$12,000/year. For a platform that didn't integrate with SEEK. Didn't have a dialler. Charged extra for email sequencing. And required a A$5K setup fee they'd already forgotten about. They switched. New cost: A$49/seat/month. Four seats. A$196/month. A$2,352/year. They saved A$9,648 in the first year. And they got MORE features, not fewer: - SEEK + Indeed scraping (included) - AI email sequences (included) - Browser dialler with AI transcription (A$10/mo add-on) - Email verification (included) - E-sign (included) I'm not saying every agency should switch CRMs. I'm saying every agency should know what they're actually paying for. [COMMENT with what you're paying per seat — I'll tell you if there's a gap]
Customisation tips:
  • The A$9,648 saving is a powerful hook — lead with the number if using as an ad.
  • Avoid naming the competitor CRM directly — let people figure it out.
  • Offer a free audit in the comments for anyone who shares their current costs.

50 candidates in 10 minutes (Chrome extension)

A recruiter told me they found 50 qualified candidates in 10 minutes. I asked how. "I searched for [JOB TITLE] on LinkedIn, turned on your Chrome extension, and hit 'Save All'. It pulled every profile on the page into my CRM automatically." No manual data entry. No copy-pasting. No switching between tabs. Then they ran "Find Email" on all 50. Got 38 verified email addresses. Launched a personalised outreach campaign the same afternoon. By end of week: - 38 emails sent - 6 replies (15.8% reply rate) - 2 phone calls - 1 placement From LinkedIn search to placement in 5 days. The tool didn't do the recruiting. It removed the friction so the recruiter could focus on what actually matters — talking to people. [What's your go-to sourcing workflow? I'm curious how others approach this]
Customisation tips:
  • Replace [JOB TITLE] with something specific to your audience.
  • Include a screenshot of the Chrome extension in action if possible.
  • The 15.8% reply rate is strong — reference it in your headline hook.

Contrarian Take

Challenge conventional wisdom to spark conversation.

CRM pricing is broken

[POPULAR CRM] charges A$99/seat/month. Plus A$1,000-50,000 setup. In 2026. For software. Let that sink in. A recruitment agency with 5 consultants is paying A$6,000-60,000+ in year one for the privilege of using a tool that should be making them money, not costing it. And that's before add-ons: - Email sequencing: extra - Phone integration: extra - Data enrichment: extra - Email verification: extra - Reporting: sometimes extra The SaaS industry trained us to accept this. "It's enterprise software. It's complex. Implementation takes time." No. It's a contact database with email and phone features. And in 2026, there's no reason it should cost more than your office rent. The next generation of CRMs won't win on features. They'll win on value. [HOT TAKE? Or fair comment? Let me know below]
Customisation tips:
  • Replace [POPULAR CRM] with a generic description like 'the market leader' to avoid legal issues.
  • This will generate debate — be ready to respond thoughtfully in comments.
  • Pair with a simple graphic comparing old vs new pricing models.

Your ATS is not a CRM

Unpopular opinion: your ATS is not a CRM. An ATS tracks applicants AFTER they've applied. A CRM finds prospects BEFORE they know you exist. Most recruitment agencies use their ATS for everything — applicant tracking, client management, business development, pipeline reporting. And then wonder why their BD outreach is inconsistent. Here's the difference: ATS handles: - Job postings and applications - Interview scheduling - Candidate status tracking - Compliance and reporting CRM handles: - Prospecting and lead discovery - Email outreach and follow-ups - Phone conversations and notes - Pipeline and revenue tracking The best recruitment teams use BOTH. The CRM does the dirty work — finding, contacting, qualifying. The ATS does the clean work — tracking, placing, invoicing. Stop asking your ATS to do a CRM's job. It wasn't built for that. [AGREE or DISAGREE? I want to hear from agency owners on this one]
Customisation tips:
  • This directly aligns with Kolvera's positioning — 'pre-ATS staging ground'.
  • Expect pushback from ATS vendors — engage respectfully.
  • Follow up with a post about how the two systems should integrate.

Cold calling isn't dead

Cold calling isn't dead. Cold calling without data is. There's a massive difference between: A) Dialling 100 random numbers from a purchased list and hoping someone picks up. B) Calling 15 decision-makers who opened your email twice this week, work at companies actively hiring for the role you specialise in, and have a verified direct dial. Option A is what gave cold calling a bad name. Option B is how the best recruiters and sales teams actually operate. The phone is still the fastest way to close. But only if you know: - WHO to call (decision-maker, not gatekeeper) - WHEN to call (after email engagement, not random Tuesday) - WHAT to say (reference their company, their role, their problem) Data doesn't replace the conversation. It makes the conversation worth having. [If you still cold call — what's your approach? Genuinely curious]
Customisation tips:
  • This resonates with both recruiters and B2B sales teams — broad audience.
  • Share your own call stats in the comments (calls made, connect rate, meetings booked).
  • Follow up with a 'how I prepare for a cold call' process post.
Connecting... ▲

Quick Dial

Loading...
Open Full Dialler
0:00
Unknown
Listening...
0:00